Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Feux04/Sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was move to mainspace. I did not perform a history merge, as I didn't see it necessary for attribution, as the now redreicted article was very short. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Feux04/Sandbox

 * Relisted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Relisted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:STALEDRAFT: not edited since 2009. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Need some further commentary about whether a merger makes sense. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not "stale" by any sensible definition.  Merge to COBL and rename to Cordon-bleu protein.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete 2009 is stale. Legacypac (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Again, it is not stale. The subject is stable, not prone to going off.  The content remains current and is superior to the mainspace version.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to COBL, per SmokeyJoe, although I'm not sure what the best article name should be. I did some checking: (1) it does appear to be a real human protein with multiple references in the article and more easily to be found; (2) it does not appear to be some cut-&-paste copyvio. It is also vastly more built-out than the existing mainspace stub. However, given that the creator disappeared three years ago and that the draft has been untouched for seven years, it is stale and action is called for--in this case, for promotion to mainspace. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok I'm happy to see it go to mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.