Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fix Bayonets!//Userboxes/Confederate defend ancestors

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per WP:SNOW.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 04:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Fix Bayonets!//Userboxes/Confederate defend ancestors

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Whitewashing of a racist state, inflammatory/divisive. Dronebogus (talk) 10:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Once again – this is not an acceptable way for people in the Southern US to underline how proud they are of their ancestry (unlike these two userboxes – Template:User Southern and Template:User Southern2). We don't need pro-Confederate userboxes disguised as "defense of ancestors". Also, its hardly comprehensible to speak about "honor" of those who fought to perpetuate slavery. —Sundostund (talk) 12:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would nominate the userbox for WP:G10 if I were certain that it qualified. That decision shall be left to an administrator. This could also be viewed as any user displaying this as preaching upon a WP:SOAPBOX. — Jkudlick &#x2693; (talk) 00:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's inflammatory and substantially divisive. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Andre🚐 02:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Completely inflammatory. Curbon7 (talk) 05:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, divisive and inflammatory. Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As written this is a terrible thing to have for Wikipedia as it implies hostility. I'm not sure how there can be a user-box on this delicate issue, it would be interesting if some of these "Confederate ancestors" had remorse after the fact and/or went on to do better things. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UBCR Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as inflammatory. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.