Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FkpCascais/Wikileaks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy keep per WP:SNOW and lack of policy-based reasoning in the nomination statement. lifebaka++ 23:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

User:FkpCascais/Wikileaks
Also nominating: User:Mariah-Yulia/Userbox/Wikileaks I think this UBX should be deleted until Assange's case is over, when it can be safely undeleted.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 15:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)  Kayau  Voting   IS   evil 15:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Any particular reason why?  Skomorokh   15:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I know nothing about law in Florida, but I *think* this may be against the law in HK (maybe contempt of court or something.)  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 15:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

So, you basically know nothing? It´s just "I think... in HK, perhaps Florida..." are you sure you´re acting acording to WP principles? Basically the userboxes say nothing more than non-specified support for wikileaks and J.Assange. The support can be simply moral, or it can be meaning contributions to wikileaks. Shouldn´t you "study" better the case before PFD? I mean, it´s nothing personal, but shouldn´t you provide at least 1 WP principle appliable here when PFD? I also think many things... FkpCascais (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I am proposing closing this PFD, not because one of the pages proposed for deletion is mine, but because this PFD has no valid rationale: I think FkpCascais (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. What Assange's case has to do with it seems totally unclear to me.     DGG ( talk ) 20:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Supporting Wikileaks is not especially divisive or controversial. It's not like we're bellyaching about Hezbollah or anything. Tarc (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per "wtf?" &mdash; if you want to start a general discussion on advocacy/opinion-userboxes, go ahead, but this isn't the way to go about it. People say they support or oppose all sorts of stuff on their usepages &mdash; political parties, exile groups, cats that wear panties, and whatnot. I've never been a fan of this kind of stuff, but if people wanna scream their POV into your face, let them. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 19:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep IANAL, but I don't think it is illegal to support Wikileaks and/or Julian Assange. (Some people even think he's cute.) Suggest speedy close due to lack of policy-based rationale by nominator. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  21:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.