Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FlightTime/Uw-Consensus (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per author request. ✗ plicit  00:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

User:FlightTime/Uw-Consensus

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Violates long-established policies. WP:BOLD, WP:EP, and WP:EDITCON are not only some of the most fundamental policies the vast majority of editors adhere to but describe how this project works. making edits on Wikipedia pages without first discussing your changes is never enough reason to give someone a level-1 warning as it's what they're supposed, and encouraged, to do. Responding to recruitment efforts like Growth features and receiving this as a result must be kafkaesque.

If you have a problem with an edit, be specific! We have plenty of more effective warning and notification templates on edit warring, referencing, reliable sources, BLP, DS, etc. This just facilitates WP:BITE (as it did here).

The user restored it despite speedy-deleting it following the previous nomination. The fact the user still has it in their Twinkle options indicates intention to use it. Nardog (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.