Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Flowerrock/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Flowerrock/sandbox


Effectively empty sandbox page - contains a user signature so not quite the Speedy category - from editor inactive for three years. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Pages like this should just be blanked. I'm not sure what is exactly wrong with just ignoring this page - there is no AfC template or categories involved.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - New editors are encouraged to use the sandbox to experiment and learn wiki markup.  Trying out a signature is certainly within the scope of use for a sandbox. --Whpq (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per above. The page contains nothing problematic. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.