Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Franavar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, also, snow.. -- Cirt (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Franavar


Advertising Trixt (talk) 07:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --m:dferg 12:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  03:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy close as I have blanked the userpage. Problem solved.  :)    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 03:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. The creator, after seeing the page's nomination for deletion, removed the mfd tag. The user did this despite the MfD notice placed on his/her talk page, which informed the user: "You are free to edit the content of User:Franavar during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion" (mine emphasized). This deceptive behavior indicates that this user will likely restore the content if the page is blanked. To reinforce community consensus that Wikipedia is not for advertising, I ask that this nomination be allowed to run the full seven days. I endorse 's interim blanking of the spam but disagree that blanking is sufficient. This promotional page should be deleted to discourage its restoration. Cunard (talk) 04:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, plain advertising. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.