Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Frankie Cutlass

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Histmerged - in case it's necessary for the licence, since it ain't harmful. Wily D 08:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Frankie Cutlass


Article submission was declined on January 30 at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frankie Cutlass. Should this page be deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE, or moved to a subpage? Dianna (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The eponymous user currently working on it may wish to adopt it until it's completed, though that has its own set of problems. But it doesn't really belong in failed-AfC state. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Someone's already put an improved version of this article directly into the mainspace, where I think it will survive any notability challenges--sources have been added and there seem to be plenty more RS ones out there. So, this old version does not need saving anywhere else. Not sure if it should just be blanked, deleted, or what, though. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.