Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Frankie Rio/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete Beeblebrox (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Frankie Rio/sandbox


WP:STALEDRAFT. User has almost no other contribs besides trying to AFC this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a copy of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Conversation (marketing agency). As a Userspace draft, I don't see "WP:STALEDRAFT. User has almost no other contribs besides trying to AFC this" as sufficient reason to delete, as replacing with Inactive userpage blanked is more appropriate.  The AfC draft is pretty decent in look.  A bit promotional, yes.  Sourced.  The sources may not achieve sufficient independence or third-partiness.  I suspect it probably would not survive WP:AFD.  However, I'd prefer to see this moved to mainspace and tested at AfD.  As the author is not currently active, that may be unfair, and so replacing with Inactive userpage blanked is more appropriate.  I can't think why anyone should be advised to submit an article through AfC.  The new editor should be better advised to editi existing pages, to learn the ropes, to become autoconfirmed, and then to write an article directly in mainspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:04, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, in absence of evidence of benefit to retaining this page. --BDD (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.