Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fred R Waterford

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. With no actual deletion rationale, there is chilly weather impending. I encourage everyone to find something better to do with their time than trawling userspace to find something they can put through a bureaucratic process. (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Fred R Waterford

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Wp:nothere (may be sock of XaotikHP), user pages are ultimately owned by the community blah blah RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete, it was clearly a vandalism only account and blocked immediately, no reason to keep this vandalism-only page either. Tehonk (talk) 08:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - No deletion rationale provided. NOTHERE is a block rationale, not deletion. There is nothing problematic on the user page. If found to be a sock, the page will likely qualify for speedy deletion. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 15:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did provide a rationale. User pages are owned by the community. If the community thinks that using your page solely to award yourself unearned barnstars and stuff is worthy of deletion, then…
 * RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 22:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That is not a deletion rationale. You can find the deletion rationales at WP:UPNOT and WP:NOT.
 * If the page is moderately bad, undesirable or worthless, consider blanking it as an ordinary edit. Use Userpage blanked. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. There isn't much to discuss when the deletion rationale is absent. User pages being owned by the community doesn't mean that they are leased to individuals while they are in good standing, and that the lease expires when their editing privileges are revoked.—Alalch E. 13:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.