Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FreddieRockStar1991/Queen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep Thanks/wangi 09:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

User:FreddieRockStar1991/Queen
User subpage for a user that did not contribute since 5 December 2006 and made a total of 20 edits in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. (contested prod by a user that thinks such pages should go to MfD)
 * Comment- I'm the admin who declined the prod – I was working through the June 7 prod backlog and came across this one. As a newbie admin, I thought that user pages that are not speedy deletes come here to MfD per WP:CSD. That's why I took off the prod warning. However, WP:PROD says "pages in the User and User talk namespaces may be proposed for deletion if the user has no recent edits and has made few or no contributions to the encyclopedia."
 * I have no opinion on the page in question, but I'd like to know which guideline to use. I'll watch this discussion to find the answer. Thanks! - Krakatoa  Katie  08:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep a history of Queen albums, not damaging to the project. -N 10:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Errr, I'd agree it is harmless, but Queen discography is much better, and is in the article space. This is merely a draft hanging around since November 2006. -- lucasbfr talk 11:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. The user did make a few Queen related edits, and probably set up this subpage as part of a project which never came to fruition. Since it appears to have been used for encyclopedia building and not as free webspace, I will say that it should be kept on principle. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not used as a webhost, but a sandbox for the user, who could come back and continue working on it. Even though it'd be unlikely, futile and inferior to Queen discography, I don't see the point in deleting good faith efforts. –Pomte 01:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.