Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Frieda Beamy/Coffee Joulies

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep as a redirect. Ruslik_ Zero 16:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Frieda Beamy/Coffee Joulies


Draft for a promotional article, now in article space.  DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect As page creator, my intent was to keep good records and retain histories to establish what I contributed. This intent would be served by redirecting the page to Coffee Joulies. The text was already copied to Talk:Coffee Joulies for consideration by other users, and I wanted to retain the draftpage history to demonstrate the contribution history for that text, and I think that Wikipedia's intended route for maintaining histories. I am also a potential-COI editor, so I have a little more interest in keeping my personal history transparent, but I don't think there is any interest served by deletion rather than redirect, and it seems to be a common discussion outcome. I would change it to a redirect myself if I felt no other editors would take it as out-of-process. Frieda Beamy (talk) 23:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Also, I originally stated the need to retain the history for transparency at Talk:Coffee Joulies. Frieda Beamy (talk) 23:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Should be blanked or made into a redirect. It should not be deleted if it contains the edit history of what it being used in the article. GFDL requires that we give proper attribution and that requires that we keep edit histories. Chillum 00:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Did the contributions ever make it IN TO the article? If so, this should be history merged, then the way to retain the history for you user would be in your contributions history. —  xaosflux  Talk  01:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Chillum 01:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * As potentially conflicted, I don't think the contributions made it in; I put them on the talk page, so if I understand you rightly the subject page could be history merged with Talk:Coffee Joulies. Frieda Beamy (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.