Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Frpcad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Frpcad
This user page appears to be blatant spam vandalism -- however, an administrator removed the speedy deletion notice from this user page. John254 14:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no speedy criterion available for deleting user pages. Please do not abuse speedy criteria. Also, keep this user page. It's a user page, it's not being abused any more than hundreds of other user pages are - it doesn't even have a link out. ➨  ЯEDVERS  14:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not support the project and this is not a free web hosting service. It used to have contact details, but they were removed by an IP address. And the Pokemon test does not apply to user pages any more than it does to articles. --Sam Blanning(talk) 14:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * We usually grant some leeway to good users. This user's contribution history is ambiguous at best.  I count one "good" edit balanced against mostly self-promoting edits.  Unless the user comes forward and promises to turn over a new leaf, I'm going to argue to delete.  By the way, the admin was entirely correct to remove the invalid speedy-tag.  While it might be spam, it is not vandalism in the strict way we use that term for speedy-deletions.  And being spam is not a speedy-deletion criterion.  Rossami (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.