Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fshussain/Bullet Quarterly

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 16:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Fshussain/Bullet Quarterly

 * Time stamp for the relisting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Time stamp for the relisting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Student publication only started in 2011. No claim of notability asserted in this stale draft. Legacypac (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - no reason for deletion given in nomination. VQuakr (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:U5 via WP:STALEDRAFT point #4 (i.e. "If the material is promotional, or otherwise unsuitable, and the author was never a serious Wikipedia contributor, consider tagging for speedy deletion per WP:CSD"). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Stricken due to policy manipulation. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * the only policy manipulation was Godsy wiping out over a year worth of policy work by other editors. Legacypac (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Same editor created Bullet Quarterly in mainspace which was deleted by prod in April 2011. If it was kept, it would have been history merged together and deleted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It wasn't my opinion, but a clear consensus at WT:N that said Wikipedia-notability is only for mainspace. There is no other reason for deletion.  Recommend blanking.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's nothing to suggest a notable article here at all, barely any contents, no other convincing signs to keep for now. Simply housecleaning, SwisterTwister   talk  07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per same reasons for deletion of mainspace article: Non-notable student publication. No claim to notability provided. Created by single-purpose account. Also agree with SwisterTwister. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.