Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GTA Ganxtaize/Blog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus, leaning toward Keep. To say that a page which has only one entry which is not directly relevant to wikipedia, despite the presence of an equal amount of content relevant to wikipedia, a violation of policy or guidelines is stretching a point. Also, this editor has been a productive editor, and a certain amount of leeway is generally given in such instances. Concerns that the page might be used in an inappropriate way in the future are reasonable concerns; however, there is no clear reason to believe that the page, as it exists today, is being used as such. If the page were to, in the future, become used in such a way as to violate WP:BLOG, then it could certainly be renominated at that time. John Carter (talk) 00:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

User:GTA Ganxtaize/Blog
Wikipedia is not a blog. Violates WP:BLOG and WP:MYSPACE. I remember taking it up with the user to get the blog deleted and so far the user has decided not to take action. BoL (Talk) 02:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * See also: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jdavidb/blog. BoL (Talk) 02:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That was closed as keep. Just a note. -- WP holic  (user)(talk) 07:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. BoL (Talk) 05:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Yes, Wikipedia is not a blog, but this one only has two entries, one of which is Wikipedia-related. It's not clear that it's blatantly in violation of policy. If the user uses it to post non-Wikipedia-related commentary, then it should be deleted, but it's too early to judge that yet. Terraxos (talk) 23:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, self-identified 'blog' is against the rules, no matter how Wikipedia related. +Hexagon1 (t) 03:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on this I presume you no longer hold to this view. Do you still favor deletion?--Doug.(talk • contribs) 02:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep unless blog becomes personal. There has been only one entry on this blog so far, excluding the introduction to the blog, and that lone entry is Wikipedia-related. Maybe we shouldn't jump the gun. -- WP holic  (user)(talk) 07:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.