Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gaialpuig/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

User:Gaialpuig/sandbox


This looks like a WP:NOTWEBHOST vio or aborted draft or even some sort of memorial (NOTMEMORIAL). There's not much in Google News, which would lead me to believe there isn't a significant likelihood of notability were we to attempt to write an article about him. Google Books lists a number of his books but not much in the way of independent work. Izno (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Ric Masten may hold some interesting context, but given the date of deletion I would guess it's just a copy of this page. --Izno (talk) 14:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Only contained the one word "Ric" -- see also Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank per WP:STALEDRAFT. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 01:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - All of the subsequent paragraphs after the first are Lorem ipsum patent nonsense. One lead paragraph in English doesn't justify keeping the rest of the nonsense, or the work of sorting out nonsense from sense.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete-per RMC.Patent Lorem Ipsum nonsense. &#x222F; WBG converse 14:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I cleaned the draft up. There are a plethora of pages like this in the userspace. All deleting such pages when they are brought here does is encourage more nominations of the same kind, when the pages should just be blanked with inactive userpage blanked. As far as justification goes, think of the time spent by those reviewing the pages and commenting in the discussions. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Move to User:Gaialpuig/Ric Masten and advertise somehow. Plausibly notable. The bad page title may be the reason nobody has found this.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Request temporary undeletion of Ric Masten. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that course of action as well. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:10, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.