Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Galico/my userboxes/Re establishment of the Spanish Empire

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  14:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Galico/my userboxes/Re establishment of the Spanish Empire

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Obvious attempt at promoting colonialism, clearly inflammatory and divisive. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 18:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete the empire will never exist again. Catfurball (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - The English Wikipedia has English-literate editors in many countries and regions, including Latin America and the Caribbean. Therefore divisive as per nom.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think "clearly inflammatory and divisive" is exaggeration.  However, as this does not seem to be able to be associated with declaration of an editor bias (I don't see any mainspace material on revival of the Spanish Empire), I would support disallowing such userboxes if there were an RfC on political userboxes without connection to actual mainspace content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I believe that all transcluders of a userbox should be notified when the userbox is nominated for deletion. The nomination seeks to modify their userpages.  This userbox has five other transcluders, four long gone, but one of which, User:Half-kratos21, edited recently. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. by userboxes without connection to actual mainspace content do you mean political opinions that don't have a wikipedia article or?
 * because they are many political opinions that might also have political userboxes but might not have a wikipedia article. Half-kratos21 (talk) 03:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean, a defence of a political userbox is that it is a user’s declaration of their bias, which might come into play in their mainspace editing. This assumes that the politics is an encyclopedic topic, and simple proof of that is the politics being covered in an article, any article. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Some people plaster their Userpage with many Userboxes. This might be a reason to ask the user to be more concise with their Userpage, but it is not a reason to delete the userbox templates. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Agree about informing the transcluders. Something like that happened to me once. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 23:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.