Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks
What's this supposed to be? It doesn't look like an article work-in-progress, as it's been here for years with no sign of proper wikification or moving to mainspace. I also see User:Ganerer has been deleted for being non-encyclopedic social media stuff - is this more of the same? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, User:Ganerer appear to have no live edits (just 6 deleted ones), and judging by User talk:Ganerer might not have been around since 2006. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as inactive user. Also, the userpage apparently was PROD'ed 3 years ago, since when does PROD apply to userpages??? &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Inactive user, and whatnot.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 20:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to User:Zzzzz/List of computer pranks because Ganerer isn't active.--180.180.109.229 (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with the 180.180.109.229, just remove the Ganerer part in the page title and it's all done.113.211.184.202 (talk) 12:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I suggested actual deletion because I don't think it is suitable as a mainspace article. It's not properly wikified, most of it is not properly referenced - what "references" there are are mostly to things like Youtube, primary sources of the "prank", and personal sites, which are not considered reliable sources. Basically, there's almost nothing there to attest to the actual notability of each "prank" - it's a whole great list of non-notable stuff -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems time to point out Articles for deletion/Computer prank (3rd nomination), Articles for deletion/List of computer pranks (2nd nomination), and Articles for deletion/List of Screamers. Uncle G (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this WP:FAKEARTICLE. Userspace is not for indefinitely storing deleted content. MER-C 06:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.