Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gaquay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by User:Athaenara. — xaosflux  Talk  13:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Gaquay
Violates the policy that wikipedia is not a webhost, and also appears to be advertising. I asked the user to delete it a couple of days ago, he has not responded so far. This is, apparently, the users only contribution other than a page deleted as a copyvio. Ironholds 20:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This reads like an advertisement, which violates WP:NOT, and this user is using his userspace as a webhost, which again violates WP:NOT. We shouldn't temporarily ignore WP:NOT because this user has been asked to change his page before this was tagged. Also, I doubt this user will be a serious editor any time soon since his last edit was in mid-May, all his edits were to his userpage, and all his edits were on the same day.--SJP (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a case of wanting to ignore WP:NOT; I wouldn't have nominated the page if I didn't want it gone. In the past, however, people have said "ooh, it's unfair to delete it, you should ask him nicely to remove it first" and so on, so I just did it to shush them (and also because Gaquay doing so would save me a lot of time). Iron<b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 11:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as G11 - Blatant advertising. --UsaSatsui (talk) 15:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I previously tried to do so; G11 apparently only applies to articles. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 17:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. The G criteria apply to all namespaces.  It only applies, however, if it's completely blatant (like this).  --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, i'll take that up with an admin who refused G11 deletion of a bit of blatant advertising, then. Thanks for the heads up! serves me right for treating admins like the Oracle of Delphi, they're still only human. <b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 18:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, User already nicely asked; or Speedy Delete as G11 - Blatant advertising - This is not plausibly a genuine newcomer. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.