Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geek2003/1140E

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - looks okay by everybody. Wily D 06:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Geek2003/1140E

 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500
 * -- see Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS 2500

Collection of promotional WP:STALEDRAFTs/WP:FAKEARTICLEs. All of these pages haven't been touched by the user concerned since at least March 2012. Geek2003 appears to be participating in a coordinated spam campaign for Avaya (see User:Gigs/Avaya Pushers), which just so happens to be related to all of these pages. (There are a couple of more recent pages which I have excluded.) MER-C 02:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete in full agreement with nom. -- No  unique  names  23:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Since Geek2003 went dark around the time I made my evidence public, I'm not sure if it's a coincidence or he's just waiting to see if this will blow over. In any case, a lot of these specific avaya hardware series articles already are in mainspace as parts of other articles, and can be deleted. Gigs (talk) 23:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no need to provide free webhosting for an attempt to promote a particular company, and it appears all reasonable material has already been used. Johnuniq (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.