Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geis Knight/Books/media explorer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Geis Knight/Books/media explorer

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Clear WP:NOTWEBHOST violations that comprise the user's only edits. Books has been deprecated, and nothing in these books seems salvageable anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. The "community maintained" book namespace was depreciated and removed, not the entire book creator, removing that would have to be a decision made by the WMF. It is still possible to and acceptable to use the book creator to make personal books in your own userspace, go to Special:Book, and on demand refunds and userfication was offered when the namespace was deleted. There are currently 51,000 + user namespace books: Category:User namespace book pages. These pages all seem to be sensible attempts at putting together books of articles on related topics, I don't see any compelling reason to delete them. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 23:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per 192.76.8.70 `* Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - the books don't become unrelated to Wikipedia just because the Wikipedia tool went away. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.