Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geniusdream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Geniusdream
I would like to have this userpage and talk page of an indefinitely blocked user, per "no shrines for vandals" rule. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Whats there to delete, no shrine at all? - Marcusmax ( speak ) 03:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep'. Contains information that would be valuable in investigations if the user decides to sockpuppet again. Deleting it would make it harder to find if it's needed. - Mgm|(talk) 10:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep' this is useful information, and is not a shrine. Where is the WP:no shrines for vandals page or rule? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * We generally prefer to not have "shrines" for vandals, as per the school of thought set out at Revert, block, ignore. Since all that trolls and vandals really want is recognition, RBI helps to guard against that. Glass  Cobra  22:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.