Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Guantanamo captives weighed many times

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Guantanamo captives weighed many times
Nearly two year old, abandoned page without any chance of ever becoming an article or even part of an article. Fails WP:FAKEARTICLE. Consists almost completely of a near-empty list. If filled, would be a list of primary-source based personal details. Fram (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Request to possible closing administrators -- nominator and another contributor have nominated a flood of pages and articles for deletion, far more than anyone can reasonably be asked to effectively respond to in the time allotted. Note: I accept, at face value, our nominator's assurances that all of their recent flood of were sincerely intended.  Nevertheless, there has  not been anywhere near the time necessary to address these xfd.  So I request a relisting, not a closure.   Geo Swan (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Cunard. In addition it is a poorly sourced WP:FAKEARTICLE. As a side note. It could also be seen as a Coatrack of Guantánamo Bay hunger strikes. The sources is also already used in that article. IQinn (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.