Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Master list of articles I have started/2020-01

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. WP:SNOW. Clear consensus to retain, no policy-based reason to delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Master list of articles I have started/2020-01

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Indef blocked user, not a web host BilCat (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being blocked is not a reason to delete subpages, not without a very good rationale, such as the pages being the reason for the block.  Planning and tracking in your own userspace of your own article creations is never a NOTWEBHOST issue. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep We don't do scorched earth. Johnuniq (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not webhosting as the relation to Wikipedia is clear. I don't see any WP:UP violation or any other reason why this can't just be ignored. Really the only reason to bring something here is that the userpage content is problematic even if blanked. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep — Clearly Wikipedia-related, not harmful or problematic. —  csc -1 04:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:UPNOT, pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project; these clearly do so. Also per WP:GRAVEDANCING. ——  Serial  09:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Irrespective of the relationship to the blocked editor, this information might be of use to other editors reviewing the work of the blocked editor. BD2412  T 20:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is clearly part of an effort to build an encyclopedia. -- Whpq (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per prior, with prejudice against the future "evil blocked user needs everything eradicated" nominations for the next high-profile block that are inevitably going to happen anyway (and I say this as someone who thinks Swan fucked up substantially with the actions that got him indeffed). Vaticidalprophet 01:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.