Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/abusive presiding officer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/abusive presiding officer
Three year old page without any apparent posible use. Source doesn't work. Can never be turned into an article. Personal interpretation of the style of a BLP. Fram (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete-Not sure exactly what's going on here. From what I can tell, the user took a transcript of a board proceeding, decided the unnamed presiding officer was "abusive" and wrote a userspace draft article about said unnamed officer. As Fram said, nothing here has any hope of becoming an article.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and Fyre2387. In addition this is entirely WP:OR based on the interpretation of questionable primary source material. Possible BLP issues though it is not easy to figure out the identities. Does this user has inside knowledge of Guantanamo? Any connection there? For the WP:OR: The user is fully aware of the problematic and trouble that this brings to all of us at Wikipedia. Did he fix the problems he caused in main space? No. (against his promise). Does he show signs to work with the community and fix problems in his User space. No. After more than a year of friendly attempts to clean up this mess i have to say that this behavior of large scale manufacturing of original research and the failure to fix problems and to work with the community is disruptive. IQinn (talk) 21:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Three years is more than enough time for a userspace draft to be expanded, improved, and moved to the mainspace. Cunard (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.