Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/codename Mark

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/codename Mark
Three year old page which hasn't got a snowballs chance in hell of ever becoming an article. No indication why the subject would be in any way notable. No indenpendent sources at all. Fram (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Three years in user-space is quite enough. The page has no chance of ever becoming suitable for mainspace (as an article it would also probably qualify for CSD A1). Nsk92 (talk) 12:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. He sums it up correctly. IQinn (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and per nom. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 18:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.