Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/habeas/Mohabat Khan v. Bush

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/habeas/Mohabat Khan v. Bush


userfied after PROD tagging by an editor. lying here without improvement since July 2010. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST  D Big X ray  21:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:STALEDRAFT. Achowat (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment -- This userspace page was not in compliance with WP:STALEDRAFT -- an oversight I apologize for. GeSwan (talk) 16:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The  __NOINDEX__  directive, which is transcluded in userspace draft and userspace notes, prevents pages from being searched by the web crawling robots that search engines use to build the indices they require to respond to search requests. I suggest that no page with one of those directives on it can be in violation of WP:NOT.  Geo Swan (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And that's plainly false. Whether you can get to the page from Google is irrelevant: what is relevant is that Wikipedia provides userspace for the limited purpose of helping editors to improve articles, not to collect and indefinitely retain random bits of information that are not being used to construct articles. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Cunard (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:STALEDRAFT, there needs to be forward movements on user space drafts, and this page has been sitting without improvement too long, even taking into account the user's long term and extensive contributions to Wikipedia content. This page appears to be part of a collection of stale draft user page in this area, which also makes the page fall under WP:NOTWEBHOST. Search engines are not a source of concern, so keeping because __NOINDEX__ is added to the page still fails to address the issue of a stale draft that viloates WP:STALEDRAFT and that also is a web page that violates WP:NOTWEBHOST. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.