Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was U1'ed. Courcelles 03:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/training camps/Mehrez training camp
Previous deleted article, not worked on, poorly sourced negative information about a living person. User space is not our personal deletionpedia specially when there are possible BLP issues. IQinn (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Userspace is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 04:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, previously deleted article. Userspace is not for storage of deleted content. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are no BLP issues here. This is valuable working documentation, which Geo has built up with painstaking meticulousness.  Much of the PD material is being moved to Wikisource, and that is fine, let Geo proceed with that at his own pace. Rich Farmbrough, 07:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC).


 * Comment - there are BLP issues as the whole thing is a serious allegation against a living person that is based on one primary source. The only source for the existence of this training camp is a primary source that based their findings on unreliable unclassified intelligence sources. It might be true or not and their would be no problem if we would have independent secondary sources that would verify this. Poorly sourced allegations against living people are unacceptable under any standard that we have. 2) There is nothing to move here as the source is already at Wikisource. IQinn (talk) 09:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:STALEDRAFT states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:STALEDRAFT, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 10:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is pushing too hard, and that tends to give an unfortunate impression..  Having deleted the articles from mainspace for the moment, I'd suggest leaving well enough alone. And of course the BLP point is ridiculous, considering what is very firmly sourced in mainspace.   DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.