Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Muhammed Dawood (Bagram captive)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Muhammed Dawood (Bagram captive)
WP:FAKEARTICLE, some 9 months old. BLP sourced solely to documents from one party in the conflict, lacks reliable independent indepth sources to turn this into a neutral, BLP compliant article. Also fails WP:BIO. Fram (talk) 10:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete poorly sourced WP:FAKEARTICLE. Fails WP:BIO and most other basic requirements for sourcing and notability. IQinn (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:STALEDRAFT states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:STALEDRAFT, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and WP:FAKEARTICLE.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 05:13, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE about a non-notable person. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.