Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Review/Ken Garber

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/Review/Ken Garber
Abandoned article attempt from June 2008 on a subject who fails WP:BIO. The one independent source given only mentions him in passing, and a Google search revealed no other independent indepth sources about him. Fram (talk) 09:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Also nominated is the slightly older and even more underdeveloped duplicate User:Geo Swan/Review/Ken Garber 2. Fram (talk) 09:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, violates WP:BIO.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are no BLP issues here. This is valuable working documentation, which Geo has built up with painstaking meticulousness.  Much of the PD material is being moved to Wikisource, and that is fine, let Geo proceed with that at his own pace. Rich Farmbrough, 07:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.