Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/mysteries/Guantanamo detainees who were abused during their Tribunal or hearing

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan/mysteries/Guantanamo detainees who were abused during their Tribunal or hearing
Three pages, over four years old, with WP:OR about controversial subjects, and without any sources that could be reused. Calling persons "abusive and unprofessional" shouldn't be done, even if we can't identify them from this page. Also nominated are User:Geo Swan/mysteries/Guantanamo detainees and the Afghanistan drug trade and User:Geo Swan/mysteries/Guantanamo detainees whose identity is in doubt. Things like "One or more of the lists were described as internet advocacy sites, that were intended to draw attention to the conditions and possible innocence of the prisoners. This description could apply to Amnesty International, or Human Rights Watch. I question the intellectual honesty of anyone who argues that having one's case listed by Amnesty International, or Human Rights Watch, ties one to terrorism." are examples of soapbxing that shouldn't be on Wikipedia, and certainly shouldn't be left hanging around for four years. Fram (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:STALEDRAFT states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:STALEDRAFT, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The BLP problems and soapboxing concerns cited by the nomination statement further strengthen the position for deletion. Cunard (talk) 07:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, and as this appears to be soapboxing. It is better to simply save this on the creator's own machine than have WP used as a webhost.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.