Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:George The Dragon/Omar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

User:George The Dragon/Omar


Very stale userfied copy of deleted article. Essentially an unsourced BLP with no real claim of notability. Editor for whom it was userfied is long retired. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete.
 * Hullaballoo, linking of the alluded AfD, Articles for deletion/Omar Williams (2nd nomination), is much appreciated. Note that many speedy deletions do not prejudice ongoing userspace versions, unlike AfDs.
 * The AfD was well contested, but appears incisively closed by User:Beeblebrox. The draft appears no better than what appears to have been discussed at AfD, and while it would be nice for Beeblebrox or another admin to confirm that it is essentially a copy of deleted material, I'm pretty sure that it should be deleted.
 * Regardless of the AfD, it should be deleted as "an unsourced BLP with no real claim of notability". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

This is actually a copy of the article as it appeared just before the first time it was deleted in 2008 and is substantialy worse in quality than the version that was deleted in 2011. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.