Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Germen/Prejudices about islam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  Lord  ViD 19:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Germen/Prejudices about islam
This is a page that claims to "explore whether prejudices about Islam are prejudices or not", but is in reality a POV fork of a deleted article (Prejudices about Islam).

When I asked the user if they wished to keep the page, or if it was ok for me to go ahead and delete it I recieved no objections (nor has the user made any other edit in the intervening near month).

The page itself has had no edits since 25th July 2005.

'This MfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Hiding  talk 21:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 01:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, an interesting discussion. Not a POV fork because it has commentary within the "article"; rather, a good use of userspace for holding a debate. Ashibaka tock 16:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep until/unless deletion is requested by User:Germen. Seems to be a reasonable working page by a responsible editor.  I don't see any obvious evidence of intent to abuse the userspace here.  It's true that it hasn't been significantly edited in since the first edit but that's not evidence of wrong-doing.  Rossami (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rossami, with the caveat that (at some future point) continued inactivity and lack of response to requests will make this controversial page deletable. Xoloz 18:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. User is writing/editing on similar subjects. He/she takes relatively lengthy breaks; recent inactivity should not be misconstrued. Monicasdude 00:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.