Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Glen@commissionmonster.com.au


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Core desat  21:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Glen@commissionmonster.com.au
User is not an active contributor. Previously involved in spam. Delete per WP:NOT. Brad Beattie (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Only edits in August, this page and complaints about being nailed for spamming. --Calton | Talk 09:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam. Inactive contributor. User name may qualify for block in its own right (commercial, and reveals an email address). EdJohnston 21:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Improper username, for one, plus the reasons above. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 02:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.