Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GloriaTheAnimator/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  blank. If the user wants to resume editing this page, they can easily retrieve the contents of the page from the revision history.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 17:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

User:GloriaTheAnimator/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The "Official Twitter" has a similar username (GloriaAnimator, without the "the") as the user, which strongly suggests this is a promotional article written by the game's creator, and there are no reliable secondary sources to otherwise justify its inclusion on Wikipedia. It also hasn't been updated in over two years, so it's unlikely to be finished. Zerbu Talk 04:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank: Tag with Inactive userpage blanked. Bringing it to MfD is busywork. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank - No reason to outright delete a sandbox page, when all that is necessary is to blank it. 🌈WaltCip - (talk)  16:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment It's tagged as WP:G11]. It does not met my criteria for deletion under G11. Given the discussion here so far, I will likely decline it. Maybe someone more IAR than I will delete it. We will see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Deepfriedokra  (talk • contribs) 19:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I've declined the speedy. Not even close to G11. Fabrictramp &#124;  talk to me  20:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank per above. —Alalch E. 19:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Obviously self promotional judging by the social media accounts linked. silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  22:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank per above While linking to one's social media is one criterion for G11, the content itself was not exclusively promotiona in that it contained no promocruft, no ad content, no appeal to the reader to take an action. It was merely a description of the subject. Wot Fabrictramp said, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I realize that I am in a minority, but I see it as a draft colored by conflict of interest, and those need declining, not blanking or deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.