Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GoRight/Raul654




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was blank. Tim Song (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

User:GoRight/Raul654
Relisted on 01:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC).

This page has been here for about a year. To my knowledge, no rfc, arb, or any other kind of DR has been filed. The user which this sub-page is under is banned. Since there is no pending rfc, I propose we delete it, as it falls under an attack page, in lieu of "collecting perceived faults", or the like. As this user is banned, I see no other reason to keep it here, being that they are never going to come back, and this DR is never going to be filed.

If they are unbanned, then undeletion can be considered. The sister page in Raul's userspace is also going to be nominated for the same reasons. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 06:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Blank and do not mention it anywhere, including MfD. If all has been quiet for a year, why stir up the hornets?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why let an attack page remain?—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 09:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Better for it to "remain", blanked, never looked at, never indexed, never hurting, than to take a delicate issue that has been otherwise let go and throw it on a community discussion page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear case of WP:NPA. Even the title violates NPA.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 12:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep May be used in DR with last revision only in December -- I suspect 6 months would be a valid static lifetime, but under that it may well be in a protected class of userpage. Not at 6 months yet. Collect (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, but blank if so desired. User:Raul654/GoRight should also be blanked, if not deleted under our six-month convention. GoRight is banned at this time, but he has indicated that he is appealing to ArbCom; it's therefore premature to clean out his userspace like this. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not going to be used in a report, so it is an attack page. Johnuniq (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

The relisting of this debate is even more inappropriate that its initial listing. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Blank and oversight This attack page should not remain on Wikipedia any longer. Also agree that User:Raul654/GoRight should be deleted as an attack page. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Blank - Seventeen days is way too long for any MFD to be open, and I think it's clear that this page is counter-productive at this time.--WaltCip (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.