Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Good Thinking Atlanta/Carbone smolan agency

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete all. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Good Thinking Atlanta/Carbone smolan agency


Page copied from a Wikipedia article with no additional edits. Stale now. Legacypac (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I cannot find the article from which it was copied. Looks like a copy of something, but there is no records for Carbone smolan agency.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Rodney Smith (photographer) mentions he is co-founder of Carbone Smolan Agency. Clicking the correctly capitalized title shows it was deleted at AfD Articles_for_deletion/Carbone_Smolan_Agency restored and userfied but not to this location, so this was likely a copy paste of the now deleted article. Legacypac (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I am surprisingly disappointed with the Wikipedia search engine.  I am now finding Draft:Carbone Smolan Agency and Draft talk:PorterWritewiki:Carbone Smolan Agency.  Will have to look into these later.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Leaning...
 * Draft:Carbone Smolan Agency:Move to mainspace. Notability is clearly asserted by the sourcing.  The deciding issue is whether the sources are independent, or paid veiled promotion.   The decision should be made at AfD.  User:DGG?, I'm less confident on this one, WP:CORP being a lot tougher than WP:PROF.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No, delete all. Already deleted at Articles_for_deletion/Carbone_Smolan_Agency, nominated by DGG.  Maybe if someone could check that it is not significantly improved.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:PorterWritewiki:Carbone Smolan Agency is the deleted article userfied. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as copies, User:Good Thinking Atlanta/Carbone smolan agency and Draft talk:PorterWritewiki:Carbone Smolan Agency. Their existence suggests a clumsy effort to promote, we should look out for more copies.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not the same as the originally deleted article--it's not at all suited for article space yet. But it is a sketch with the basic factual material and a list of references, from which an article could conceivably be written. On the other hand, the persistent effort to achieve an article for an organization that we see here usually does not result on an acceptable article. I think this is only likely to be productive if  someone else altogether should do it from scratch. Ultimately, that last factor is what decided me to recommend deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 00:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not convincing for an acceptable article yet, best deleted and restarted if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  02:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Added two pages I've added the two additional pages - one being a talk page that is a copied version too - to this nom. User:SwisterTwister, SmokeyJoe, User:DGG any objections to deleting them all?  Legacypac (talk) 07:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all three. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete at best, still questionable, best restarted if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  17:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.