Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Grayghost01/image gallery

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. WP:SNOW close/withdrawal because the keep votes are pretty overwhelming. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Grayghost01/image gallery

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Part of a loose confederate revisionist propaganda page suite created by this user. Dronebogus (talk) 10:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Perfectly reasonable Userpage.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing more than pro-Confederate propaganda/revisionism; its enough to look at the wording used in this section. —Sundostund (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: A collection of images with some caption that doesn't call for restoration of CSA or explicitly approve of secession. The said images appear pretty encyclopedic too. Not enough of a reason for deletion. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Where does this page call for the restoration of the CSA? If there are divisive opinions that clearly violate WP:POLEMIC then just remove them. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I frankly don't see anything particularly problematic here, although several of the images frankly aren't useful anywhere besides a userpage (looking at you, File:Cssalabama ghost.png). Hog Farm Talk 14:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If someone looked at the MfD history over the past three or six months, they would see what I think could be interpreted as nothing less than a targeted censorship campaign against right-wing viewpoints, primarily undertaken by two users who have been warned about being delete-happy in the past. I really am not too pleased about the optics of this, at all.--🌈WaltCip - (talk)  12:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t care what people who would think that think, they’d probably already think Wikipedia is a “far left propaganda cesspool” or something. Wikipedia can’t win for losing against the hard right so I don’t really care about performative “optics” for them. Also, even I think Sundostund is a bit too paranoid in their MfD nominations. Dronebogus (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If someone looked at the MfD history before the past three or six months, they would see that I didn't participate in any MfD nomination, not to mention starting one myself. Once I realized what is the amount of inflammatory and divisive content (mostly neo-Confederate in its nature) that is just laying around (sometimes unused for years), with Wikipedia serving as a kind of "storage area" for it, my activities changed according to that. If I am doing something wrong, consensus of editors can always refuse to delete my nominations. I don't see any kind of loss to Wikipedia if its "cleansed" of such content, on the contrary. Nor do I care about the opinion of those who see such content as something desirable. I am aware it may appear as somewhat paranoid at times, but that is caused by the sheer amount of such content. Above all, it is done with the best intentions on my part. —Sundostund (talk) 13:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - No valid reason to delete. Llwyld (talk) 01:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.