Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Greghenderson2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Graywalls (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Greghenderson2006
I'm concerned that the user page verges on being used like a personal web page not consistent with WP:NOTAWEBHOST. Actual written contents is like his resume/CV and exhibit of his photos. The parts about his Wikipedia contribution is only a list. Graywalls (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Graywalls I was not aware of the WP:NOTAWEBHOST. I am happy to remove any violations of WP:NOTAWEBHOST, e.g. Personal web pages. For deletion, is it OK to cleanup? --Greg Henderson (talk) 15:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Clean up would be great. Some intro is ok, but it appears that the meat of the article tends to lean towards WP:UP Graywalls (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I am not really seeing an issue here. Some cleanup as suggested by the user above would be a good idea. The photos are half of his family, and half of other wiki subjects. The lists of articles are OK. The biography is slightly promotional, but I do not think this warrants deletion. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree once it's cleaned up so it is primarily Wiki related contents focused. Graywalls (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Graywalls I've cleaned up my user page. Please take a look and let me know if you would like me to make any further changes. --Greg Henderson (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and trout nominator. This wasn't even close to a NOTWEBHOST violation as it stood when nominated, and is perfectly ok as it stands. Users are allowd, even encouraged, to have limited biographical content, and tyop nominate the user page of a positive user, not a vandal, for deletion without discussing it individually first seems to me to violate WP:BITE, WP:AGF, and WP:CIVIL. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.