Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gurram Seetaramulu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath (talk) 12:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Gurram Seetaramulu

 * The user's only edit is to their userpage and appears to be part of a story. Wikipedia is not a webhost. - Mgm|(talk) 11:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - yea the content is not really what a user page is for, but a welcome and a point in the right direction is always nice for a newer user; I have added a welcome message. As the user page edit is the only one showing up with the account creation 6 weeks ago, I wonder if there is deleted content from the encyclopedia space.  Is this an already bitten new user? --Jordan 1972 (talk) 11:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies about not leaving a welcome message. When you've been patrolling for a while, you sometimes forget a message or two. - Mgm|(talk) 09:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Could not find a copyvio as such. While WEBHOST is a convenient rationale for deletion of almost anything,  I do not find it used in any consistent manner, hence weak to me.  Collect (talk) 11:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. The userpage is an identical copy of http://gurramseetaramulu.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html, which is (incidentally) a blog posting. –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The user has no deleted contributions. - Mgm|(talk) 09:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.