Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Habnabit/ipatroll




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted; attack page. The facts that the name of the page includes another editor's username and the userbox was transcluded to that editor's page demonstrate that the page appears to have no good-faith purpose. I am aware that another administrator declined a speedy on this page, but I find the situation sufficiently clear as to warrant an IAR override, especially since that administrator has also !voted delete here. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Habnabit/ipatroll
Calling me a troll and claiming (indirectly) that I am one isn't exacly nice page is blank AON, but history is still there. Also the user surreptitiously added the userbox to my user page. Ipatrol (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Question - Couldn't this be speedied as an attack page? Crafty (talk) 20:39, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It was, and denied. Unomi (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? Well I'll be buggered. Crafty (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, G10 doesn't apply as it's not blatantly an attack page or a negative, unsourced BLP. @Kate   (talk)  23:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The page name of Ipatroll indicates a singular purpose, the fact that the creator inserted this userbox on ipatrols userpage corroborates this. Unomi (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. Crafty (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As it is blamked (or should be), the argument for deletion is moot at best. This is the type of thing which is best ignored.  And delete the improper edit in your own userspace. Iteration of such an act would fall under WQA in any event. Collect (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an attack page. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 02:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Might not be blatant, but is definitely an attack page. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I declined the G10 proposal, since it's not a blatant attack page; it is however rather inappropriate. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.