Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hamacardo/Carters Sports & Toys

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. No prejudice against restoring this and moving it to draft space if the author returns and requests it. ‑Scottywong | [soliloquize] || 18:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Hamacardo/Carters Sports & Toys

 * – (View MfD)

8+ year old totally unreferenced abandoned draft. User has gone and the 8 edits on this page were their only edits. Unlikely to be rescued as no sources are found. ww2censor (talk) 09:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - But a perhaps silly question. Can this be moved to draft space first and then deleted?  I have a reason for asking.  If someone in the future tries to create an article, they are more likely to find a deleted draft in draft space than in user space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Should this be simply draftified, and allowed to expire in six months with a tombstone in draft space? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify and let expire per above, or failing that merely delete. This appears to be a dead-end, and we are not an indefinite web host of knick knacks. If we draftify it, there is a slight chance of someone coming to resuscitate it now that it's not Hamacardo's (not to say that Hamacardo owns the content), so that seems the slightly better option. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as noted it is Unlikely to be rescued as no sources are found. This appears to mean the topic doesn't meet GNG. The page only has two short sentences on the topic, and the third admits the article would serve as a memorial of sorts to the store. I see nothing worth saving, nor useful to anyone. -Crossroads- (talk) 19:18, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify subject to G13 as per above discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I've no strong preference either way for draftify or deletion but I really don't see anything happening or anyone likely to find sufficient sources to leave it hanging around any longer as a draft. There might be some print source to be found but most likely they will be local, so even then it would fail GNG. ww2censor (talk) 15:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.