Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Harris281/Endless Punishment




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Harris281/Endless Punishment
This is just a soapbox. Singularity42 (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete ugh. Crafty (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOW, soapbox, useless. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This essay has nothing to do with the encyclopedia, and can't really be called an attempt at an encyclopedia article either. Gigs (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete smacks of WP:OR, definitely goes against WP:UP --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs )
 * Delete Original research, WP is not a soapbox. Glass  Cobra  01:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant violation of WP:UP and WP:SOAP. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - as original research and essay, totally unsuitable for a reference work; might make a viable sermon, if you agree with the editor's theology, but we are not his/her webhost. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Refer user to Alternative outlets. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.