Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hasan yahya/Crescentology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Hasan yahya/Crescentology
Exceedingly deep thought, far too deep (and alas far too sketchily sourced) for Wikipedia. Also, User:Hasan yahya, an article about its worthy creator.

Incidentally, a tip of the hat to this fellow, who in this edit alerted me to this material (and also to a user page that I summarily deleted as unambiguous self-promotion, and also to an unobjectionable user page). Hoary (talk) 10:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Worthy as this hypothesis might be, WP is not the place for first or self-published publication of new theories. I wish the author well with this, but it belongs on some personal web hosting, or in a journal of research and theory, not an encyclopedia. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not the place for this kind of thing, regardless of how worthy it might be.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 19:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a webhost for original research. The userpage is a resume/WP:FAKEARTICLE blend. MER-C 05:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.