Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Havok/Liars

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. --RL0919 (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Havok/Liars
Axe grinding from a retired user. Something with "People are stupid inconsiderate idiots," implying Wikipedians, is certainly attacky. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Retired user, all he is doing is calling Wikipedia stupid.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 03:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid personal opinion and leaving-reason from a once-productive wikipedian.  Such leaving statements are valuable feedback., as t This page was appropriately linked from Missing Wikipedians and from nowhere else.  To delete this is to censor negative feedback, which is always a bad idea.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe -- SPhilbrick  T  18:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep We allow people to leave negative constructive feedback in the hopes that Wikipedia will improve on any potential shortcomings. Ironically, he may turn out to be correct - even if this closes as keep this time, as long as someone keeps nominating it every once in a while, it will eventually close as delete while people aren't paying attention, and gradually yet another act of censorship will go quietly unnoticed so that Wikipedia stays beyond reproach.  EdEColbert  Let me know  12:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.