Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Headbomb/MAPS

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  G7, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Headbomb/MAPS


Userfied copy of article deleted as a result of Articles for deletion/Materials and Processes Simulations. No edits to the page for almost two years. Userfication is not to be used as a long-term way of preserving a page contrary to the outcome of a deletion discussion, which has been the effect of this userfication, whatever may have been the intention. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a page from a very active user, who does not appear to have been informed of this. The topic could well be developed into an article, in spite of the AfD discussion which was 2 years ago. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  19:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - It doesn't really matter that the user is active; the page has still been sitting there for two years. If the user comes here and says that they want to continue working on it, I'll probably switch, but as it is now it should be deleted. It is still a two-year-old copy of a deleted article that has done nothing but sit there.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 19:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * User:JamesBWatson, please notify the user hosting this. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Blank, weak do not delete. Deleted content should not be kept live indefinitely.  If not being actively improved, I recommend that deleted content should be blanked during periods of inactivity on the page.  If the user has an intention to come back to this, then there is no good reason to delete, as opposed to blanking.  If deleted, the user may of course request userfication again if and when his interest renews.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and ask the user to choose between working on it or asking it be deleted. I think we'll get a sensible response. Many of us start more projects than we can finish, and once we're aware of it, can decide what to pursue.    DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per user's request. In reply to the MfD notification, wrote: "yup, don't care about it anymore, so just delete it" and "was notified, i said i didn't care. i'll say the same thing here".Cunard (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged as G7 since author requested deletion, as pointed out by Cunard. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.