Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow  •  talk  18:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Abandoned template draft from 2016 that is now redundant to Template:Db-hoax-notice. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 04:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * What’s the problem, why not leave it alone?
 * Redundant usually means redirect. SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needless fiddling with others’ userspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Template:Db-hoax-notice Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Db-hoax-notice NotAGenious (talk) 09:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. If this were in template-space it'd be worth redirecting, but in userspace? Drafting a new version of a template is a perfectly valid thing to do, and the fact that a user hasn't edited in a while doesn't put MfD in charge of superintending all his old user pages. "Let it be." Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep It has zero transclusions per What links here, and like 3 links. This is unnecessary meddling around with other users' userspace. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) { user page (@ commons) - talk }  14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.