Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hipocrite/GWCC

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep Dougweller (talk) 16:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Hipocrite/GWCC
This is a blatant attack page. It serves to purpose other than to cast doubt on other editors contributions. mark nutley (talk) 09:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. First, it's not "a blatant attack page". And secondly, Hipocrite is a party in Great Climate Change Omnibus Case of 2010. Preparing material for timely use in dispute resolution has been accepted practice since 1189. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep this is clearly preparation for an evidence posting, perhaps at Great Climate Change Omnibus Case of 2010. If you dispute or have a problem with parts of it, enter into constructive dialogue on the talk page. Verbal chat  09:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep bad faith or badly confused nom William M. Connolley (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Move to subpage of Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/Evidence, and link from the evidence and workshop pages. Now that the case is open, evidence and analysis belongs there, where it can be readily searched, archived, deleted, or whatever.  Such  material should not be left in userspace where it may long survive the case.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Page was created less than 48 hours before this nom and is clearly being developed for evidence. It has no undue attacks (I'm not saying its commentary is correct, merely that it is not much of an attack). If there is some policy reason to follow SmokeyJoe's plan, that should be done. Johnuniq (talk) 10:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Being a party to the arbcom case, he's allowed to gather his thoughts to present to the case. -- Crohnie Gal Talk  12:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Request Speedy Keep from an Arb or Clerk and absolutly do not move out of my userspace under any circumstances That is my draft evidence statement. It is not finalized. Under no circumstances should I be forced to submit my evidence before I have finished it, nor is it a violation of anything to write up evidence for dispute resolution in userspace. I have raised this on the clerks noticeboard. Hipocrite (talk) 12:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep- draft evidence page for an open arbcomm case. Guettarda (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It's reasonable to use a subpage to draft evidence for an arbcom case. No reason to delete during this active evidence gathering/submitting timeperiod.--Cube lurker (talk) 13:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.