Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hjmason92

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep per nominator's consent below. Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

User:Hjmason92


Appears to be a personal copy of part of the article on Galen. The user has made only one edit, to place this here, with the odd edit summary I added a reference list to the bottom. I believe WP:UP applies here. Auric   talk  13:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I completely apologize for adding my edits. I am a student and very new with the website, our teacher did not give me direction on how to submit my information. My edits were substantial in many of the areas and I admit I did not say that in the edit summary at the bottom. i forgot. I have a sandbox that has everything in it with the referencing as well. I can take what I did down, immediately. BUT, is there any feedback besides the nomination for deletion. The information I provided was not copied from a random source, it is my own work, I have all the referencing to prove it. I already sent the sandbox to "checked" by the sight in order to be created. What about the information given? Is it wrong? I will try to link you to my sandbox page so that you can see my actual work, without publication. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hjmason92/sandbox
 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjmason92 (talk • contribs)


 * Keep - This appears to be a good faith attempt at improving the article on Galen, but with the material created on the user page and sandbox instead of directly in the article. I suggest keeping this material at least temporarily to allow this new editor to place it in the main article on Galen.  I've left a note on the user's talk page as well. -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and yes this probably isn't technically a speedy keep reason, but the nominator didn't talk to the user before nominating the page for deletion. This is unacceptable behavior towards new users that are clearly using a sandbox page to contribute. I wonder how many new users get chased away by this type of behavior? Ego White Tray (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sorry for doing this, but my nomination was in good faith. I'm perfectly fine with keeping the content, and I bear no ill will towards the editor. So often this sort of thing is done by vandals. I made the mistake of assuming this was another example. We all make mistakes.-- Auric    talk  04:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.