Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HollySmithauthor/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Unambiguous advertising or promotion: no independent sources, no evidence of notability, self-written vanity page," refs" are spamlinks to cherry-picked reviews and sales pages for her own books Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

User:HollySmithauthor/sandbox


This is unambiguous promotion contrary to Wikipedia's policies. Nothing here constitutes grounds for an article about this person. See WP:NBIO. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - Weak delete because this is still in a magic sandbox and has not been sent to AFC yet. However, fake article applies.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete it was copied from a wikipedia page, maybe now deleted Legacypac (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * If not deleted due to being the special place of a user/sandbox, then the nominator should have boldly blanked. Legacypac appears to be saying  copied another page with without proper attribution?  I suspect that the users deleted edits would be informative and cause me to agree to "delete".  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It includes the tale tell marks of being copied from Wiki without opening the edit window. Legacypac (talk) 03:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.