Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hopiakuta/Racism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  no consensus to delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Hopiakuta/Racism
...What IS this?!? Looks like a copypaste from a LTA page and a couple other weird things. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Hopiakuta/_DonFphrnqTaub_Persina_juneteenth_2006_(_Oy_vey,_D._F._T._P._22_26,_18_June_2006_71.102.31.67_)__
 * User:Hopiakuta/_wikinude
 * User:Hopiakuta/_¡¿_doppelgänger_:_Please_do_not_delete_this_evidence_of_wikipedia_racism,_wikiracism,_wæklypædia._Thank_You.
 * Delete Wow... I thought the same thing you did. :)  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 01:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Make sure that you are sitting down and wearing protective headgear. Then read User talk:Hopiakuta/ ¡¿ kutahopia 71.102.31.67 75.80.255.85 june 2006 august 2007 and this edit for the explanation.  If your headgear is particularly strong, see User:Hopiakuta/ wikinude, created here when n:User:Hopiakuta was indefinitely blocked at Wikinews last year. See also User:hopiakuta/ DonFphrnqTaub Persina juneteenth 2006 ( Oy vey, D. F. T. P. 22 26, 18 June 2006 71.102.31.67 )   and User:hopiakuta/ ¡¿ doppelgänger : Please do not delete this evidence of wikipedia racism, wikiracism, wæklypædia. Thank You.. Some of these are user talk page archives (although the move log entries for them require at least a safety helmet before reading).  But I agree with the Wikinews administrators.  We don't need the pages that are not user talk page archives, and we don't really need Special:Contributions/Hopiakuta to continue.  Uncle G (talk) 13:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Does not violate any WP policy I find - being "weird" is not sufficient for deletion. Collect (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Following the MfD nomination, Hopiakuta has made some concerning edits such as this one which reads "This is a copy of an original policy page, evidence of your racism." Hopiakuta has made several other edits with the same edit summary. I have left a message on 's talk page about these edits. I recommend deleting this page as a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. Cunard (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Added other pages recommended by Uncle G. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I find some words used quite worrisome (especially racism). It's also quite a mess, and I haven't a clue as to its purpose. Seeing the sigs of Blood Red Sandman and Tempodivalse is also a bit worrisome, especially after Tempo decided to semi-retire. Nor did the histories help much. I'm quite undecided on this.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 02:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all These pages do not comply with WP:UP (they clearly fail "for communication and collaboration"). It looks as if there might be some explanation for their origin somewhere, but the community should simply take them at face value: they are either an attack page (comments from some old dispute?), or an attempt to look like an attack page. Johnuniq (talk) 03:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - mostly harmless. Deletion will likely upset or irritate user and the page is not causing a disturbance. The user feels that Wikipedia is not accessible to certain users and these pages are used to organize their thoughts on the matter. Hopiakuta canbe difficult to understand at times, but he means well. I had started compiling a history of the user's attempts to enhance the accessibility of Wikipedia, see . – xeno talk 03:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I didn't read every word in every page, but I didn't see anything I thought was a violation of policy.-- SPhilbrick  T  01:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. No strong reason to delete to override a productive (at times) editor's leeway in userspace.  RE: "copypaste from a LTA page", what is LTA?  If there is a copypaste copyright violation, it can usually be fixed by adding the attribution.  I don't quite get what Uncle G is saying.  "we don't really need Special:Contributions/Hopiakuta to continue"  Are we to ban this user due to random use of userspace?  "We don't need the pages ..."  Most userpages are not "needed".  "Not needed" is not enough reason alone to delete.  It's possible to argue that kook users need to be brought under control.  Is that an argument here?  I fear that enforcing norms on user behaviour does more damage than the aberrant user does if left alone.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.